Biblical Forgiveness...

As most of you know, one of my hot button issues for the church is the mysteriously missing reality of "doing life together." Let me define what I mean by this phrase. When a church does life together we mean that a church is a group of people who gather for the purpose of being God's people. We are broken and flawed individuals looking for meaning and purpose and live life with people who are just like us...broken. We are all marred by the sin and none of us are excluded. All of us are capable of the most grievous sins but none of us are beyond the reach of God to restore us. This is the first ingredient in the mixing pot of a church...Forgiveness.



Unfortunately, there is some misunderstanding when it comes to forgiveness and its place in a biblical body of believers. Let me try to explain. Forgiveness exists because sin does! When sin is present in the life of an individual and in turn is present in a church, it muddies the waters of biblical community, particular when that sin has hurt the members of that fellowship. Does this mean that a hurting groups of believers can not forgive a person their sin? Absolutely not. I was reminded this past week that Jesus told Peter that you must have an attitude of forgiveness (remember the 70x7 story). Here is the question for us to answer. When is it appropriate for that person to regain a "good fellowship" standing with that body of believers. The answer is when that person is able to recognize the extent of their sin and take complete responsibility for it. When a person is "disfellowshiped" for their actions they are the responsible party in rebuilding the relationship with trust and integrity. They must be willing to submit to the wishes of that fellowship until such time as healing has occurred.



The church or fellowship has the responsibility to continue the process of restoration and seek that for the individual in question. They must admonish him/her to flee the temptation of applying the "woe is me" mentality. I wonder if you know what I am getting at here? Satan will creep in the hearts of the already wounded and finish his destructive work by allowing that person to feel that they are getting kicked when they are down. This will deflect the responsiblity of their sin in another direction and pushing that person to think self centeredly about their situation. Only truth and transparency can heal a person or persons after the onslaught of sin!



When a church can sift the dangerous waters of pain and suffering together and protect the unity and integrity of its fellowship, that is when the church is ready to do God's work!



For His glory!

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Sharing Life...Jesus Style!

With the recent challenges that have been thrust upon Providence Baptist Fellowship in recent weeks, I have found myself busier than usual and unable to put the time into maintaining this blog as I would like. I wish I could go back and relate to you the joy that I have experienced in being one of the shepherds at PBF and the incredible encouragement and support I have been given during this period. I also wish I could recount all the various truths that I have learned during this time as well. If you will allow some foolishness on my part, I would like to make an attempt at such.



Lesson 1: Indispensability of Truth

It is no small truth to say that if "TRUTH" had not be steering the ship at PBF, then we would folding like a paper airplane on a trash compactor. (I told you it would be foolish) I say all this to say that Truth always exposes error and light always dispels the darkness. I am thankful for God's Revelation in His Word which has been guiding our congregation over the past several months let alone the past 3 weeks. Some in our world today like to act is if "Reason" is the highest of aspirations for humanity. What a wasteful and absolutely ridiculous use of intellect. The existence of knowledge presupposes a source for such knowledge. Unyoked from its divine source, knowledge is futile and dangerous. I am thankful for a church that loves Truth.



Lesson 2: Indispensability of Truth Seeking

When a church chooses to call it quits in revelatory discovery, it calls it quits in world engagement. Sadly, this is story of many churches in our day (even in my own denomination). The people of God are called to ever seek deeper and more insightful connections with the Almighty. I quiver when one comes to me and says, "I know what I believe and I have believed it for 30 years." I am sure you have heard this refrain as well. It is right to be confident in what you believe. I am surely not calling us to be insecure in our faith. What I am calling for is a humility in a search through the whole counsel of God. That is, the 66 books of the Bible are the providential givings of God to His people so as to continually grow in their understanding of the Almighty.



Lesson 3: Indispensability of Christian Community.

The most meaningful part of my Christmas vacation was the time spent with my brother's small group at our home in Virginia on Christmas eve. My brother has been given the task of caring for a group through his church in Lynchburg, VA. Some of his "flock" could not travel home for the holidays so he invited them to have a meal and fellowship with our family on Christmas eve. I saw a picture that night of what the church should look like. I am experiencing that kind of community with various members of my own church but long to see it become an ever present reality through out the entire body of Providence Baptist Fellowship. Much of Christian fellowship in our day revolves around fried chicken and church programs. There is scarce amounts of Biblical hospitality present in the church today. What streams of evangelism would be opened if we opened all of lives, scars and all, to the lives of those with whom we worship and those whom we wish would worship with us!



These are just some food for thought! Selah!

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

A Sorrow leading unto Joy

It has been a difficult week for my beloved church. We had to see a dear friend in ministry resign because of moral failure. It has saddened us greatly. For those who don't know our history at Providence, we are a new church that started after a painful seperation from a mother church which for all intensive purposes would not be led. Some now are asking the question "WHY?" Why did this happen? Did we listen to God's voice? Should be have left? Is God in this? There is anger and there is sadness, but I believe we must look for joy in the sorrow!

These questions are not easily answered, but I will try to bring some hope in light of this great tragedy. First, the Bible is clear that all men are hopelessly corrupted by sin. Save the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit, man is capable of the grossest embodiment of sin. This should not lead us to think that a saved mean or woman is not capable of sin. That would be foolish. It simply means that men are capable of "Hitler" sized sin. This should bring us great pause and instill in us a deep sense of humility.

Second, we should not measure the corpus of a man's life through the siv of his sin. Again, that would be foolish. We are all found in rebellion at times and should remember that all sin is measured equal in the eyes of God. So to say that all the work of any man or woman is wrong because they are found in sin is unbiblical and arrogant. God is grieved, but never taken off guard.

Third, we should not question the outcome of a man's leadership because of his failure. God is capable and will use the failures of man to unfold his perfect plan. How could Jesus have chosen Judas and not known he would betray Him. Was God mocked or surprised? Surely not! No, God was working sovereignly the entire time and He will continue to do so in our time. To deny this is to believe that God is not intimately and sovereignly involved in the lives of men!

I don't know about you, but I am ever more amazed by the mysterious strong hand of my God each and every day.

To God be the glory!

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Contemplating Cool

With the onslaught of demanding seminary work, my time has been limited in posting, but I ran across this article from our friends over at 9 Marks and got a hearty chuckle out of it...enjoy!

By Mike McKinley
Show me a grown man with a goatee and I’ll show you a major league baseball player. Show me a grown man with a goatee wearing sandals and I’ll show you a youth pastor.
When I was a kid, I remember that the youth pastor at our church was totally different than any other pastor I’d ever seen. He quoted rock bands and wore blue jeans to church. He was cool in a way that the other adults in my life were not. I was proud to invite my friends to church and see their negative stereotypes of Christians get blown up. The youth group thrived and "unchurched" kids were reached. The one thing that distinguished our group from others was that our pastor was cool.
As the youth pastors and youth of the 1990s become the head pastors and congregants of the 2000s, it seems like the phenomenon has only grown. It is now an unexamined assumption in many quarters: the best way to reach people is to be like them. In order to reach our culture, we must embody what the culture defines as acceptable and valuable. We must be as "cool" as we can possibly be while still retaining the gospel. That way, people will see us and not be turned off by us. Maybe they’ll even want to be us.
This shows up in both the private lives of pastors (you missional guys, I’m talking about you and your emo eyeglasses) and in the church’s corporate worship, where we seek to remove everything that might seem foreign to the unchurched visitor.
In some ways, I think being connected to the culture around us is helpful. But there are ways in which a commitment to being cool can ultimately conflict with the call of a pastor. As the resident cool guy on the 9Marks docket (which is roughly like being the ladies’ man at a Star Trek convention—damning with faint praise), here are a few thoughts:
1. Being connected to the culture is a double-edged sword.
In a sense, we all carry a set of unique interests, talents, characteristics, and strengths around with us. These can both serve the proclamation of the gospel and hinder it. So, for example, yesterday the copier repairman stopped by the church which I serve. He is a young guy who is into cage-fighting. We built a connection over that fact (one of the guys in our church also does MMA—mixed martial arts), and he was pleasantly surprised to find that a pastor could be heavily tattooed.* I shared Christ with him, and he asked for a Bible. Score one for enculturation.
But there are other ways that my appearance might be a hindrance to the gospel. I have been sharing Christ with a strict Muslim man that I see in the sauna at the gym once or twice a week. We have built a friendship and talked about spiritual matters quite often. I have little doubt that the fact that I have a large weasel tattooed on my bicep does not make him more attracted to the faith. Score one for not having tattoos. This is why I wear sleeves on Sunday mornings. In one situation my ink serves me well; in another it can make things more difficult.
2. We must always be on guard against pride.
How much of a pastor’s desire to be perceived as cool or connected to the culture is motivated by vanity or pride? Knowing the depth of our depravity and self-deception and pride, we must examine ourselves. Am I motivated to dress a certain way or listen to certain music for good reasons? Or does part of me at least want to avoid being the butt of Ned Flanders jokes? We must beware that our quest for cool doesn’t feed the vanity and pride which we need to be choking to death every day.
In fact, I fear (and here I am speaking from what I see in my own heart) that oftentimes we are at least partially motivated to reach people by pride. How much of our desire to be cool is a desire to reach people, not only for the gospel, but also for our own glory? Here’s a diagnostic question for everyone who is a pastor: if the Lord called you to shepherd sixty uncool saints until they were safely home, with no spectacular revival or ministry explosion, would you consider that beneath you? Would it seem unworthy of your gifts and a waste of your life? If so, you are being motivated by pride.
3. Much pastoral ministry is profoundly uncool.
Don’t sign up to be a pastor if you want to sound reasonable to most people or if you want to affect a cool detachment from people and ideas. The preaching of the cross is foolishness and a stumbling block to your average art community hipster. We must love the Savior more than we love the respect of others.
Also, the ironic detachment that cool requires finds little place in the work of a pastor. At times, you must be embarrassingly earnest and enthusiastic. You must love difficult and extremely mockable people with a real and true love that never seeks a laugh at their expense. You need to cry with people when they suffer unspeakable tragedy. Much of being a pastor is profoundly uncool.
4. We must never despise our brothers and sisters.
There is a real danger in becoming so puffed-up over our freedom in Christ to wear black t-shirts that we begin to look down on the Ned Flanders-style Christians who love the Lord and have served him faithfully for years. In fact, it may be that the Lord is more pleased with their humble walk (though not as sophisticated) than he is with yours. The fact is, love for other Christians is a hallmark of a true believer (1 John 2:10). Even more it must be the mark of a pastor. We have more in common with a believer in Myanmar and a believer in Duluth (even if they don’t know a pilsner from a stout or Operation Ivy from Crimpshine) than we do with the people we’re trying to reach for Christ.
The fact is, we can’t choose who will be in our flock, nor should we try. Should churches go after the "manly man" with gimmicks and mocking disdain for the average wussy church going guy? If I read Ephesians properly, the church should consist of all kinds of people: cool and square, macho and sensitive, punk rock and emo. Frankly, in my experience a sensitive guy who is not trying to be cool is about ten times more likely to fit the biblical profile of a man, even if he doesn’t ride a Harley and watch contact sports on television. Pastor your people, thank God for the diversity in the body, and love people who aren’t like you.
5. With a few exceptions, Christians who try to be cool are terrible at it.
When I was in middle school, a well meaning youth worker attempted to perform what came to be known infamously in Radnor Junior High School lore as "the Jesus rap." These were the earlier days of hip-hop, and the genre was still trying to find its sound. Well, this youth worker, a slightly pudgy white guy of about 28 years, put the effort back ten years in five excruciating minutes. I later came to find that this well-meaning man hadn’t written this material himself (thank heavens!) but that it was later recorded as part of a song called "Addicted to Love" by a man named Carman.
The point is this: not many Christians can pull it off. A few can, but you probably can’t. Seriously, ask your wife. She’ll tell you the truth. Don’t try to be something that you’re not for the sake of impressing unbelievers. It’s bad theology and it will fool no one. It’s this kind of thinking that has gotten us Christian rock music. Please, stop it. No, really. Now. I insist.
6. Being like the culture can make it hard to see the gospel.
The more we understand the world (and its definition of what is compelling and cool), the less attractive we should find it. In fact, in a society that is increasingly morally and spiritually bankrupt, it may be our incongruity with the culture that serves to highlight the gospel. David Wells says this much better than I could in his book God in the Wasteland:
By this late date, evangelicals should be hungering for a genuine revival of the church, aching to see it once again become a place of seriousness where a vivid otherworldliness is cultivated because the world is understood in deeper and truer ways, where worship is stripped of everything extraneous, where God's Word is heard afresh, where the desolate and broken can find sanctuary [emphasis mine].
Let’s pray that our churches recover that quality of vivid otherworldliness, even if it is not cool.
The conclusion of the matter is this: be who God made you to be. If you lean hipster, run with it. Be a hipster to the glory of God. If you lean in another direction, that’s great too. But Christ must be central to all who will pursue the calling of a pastor. That means putting to death our pride and scorn for others who are not like us. That means evangelizing across the boundaries of taste and preference. In the long run, it might even mean that we’re not cool.


Michael McKinley is the pastor of Guilford Baptist Church in Sterling, Virginia, and the 9Marks lead writer on church membership.
* If a member of my church is reading this and just got a shock, sorry about that. But take comfort, the fact that I have tattoos is nowhere near the worst thing about me!

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Age of Accountability...Revisited (by Joseph Stegall)


The issue of God's sovereignty has many implication that are sometimes disturbing at first glance. None more than the issue of the eternal destiny of children who die early in life. Joe is a colleage of mine at Providence Baptist Fellowship and has some comforting words regarding this issue. One note from the beginning. We know that some may still be unsatisfied with his explanation, but I appreciate his honesty and desire to think through this critically and I hope you will too! Tom

The issue of what happens to infants and the mentally disabled when they die is a difficult and sensitive issue. It is difficult because nowhere in Scripture can we find a verse that plainly teaches whether or not infants and the mentally handicapped go to heaven or hell when they die. The Scripture simply does not plainly speak to this. It is a sensitive issue because of the huge amount of emotional longing for the salvation of our loved ones that all believers have for their family members. This longing is a good and right longing for all parents and family members to have! So approaching this topic should be done with humility, grace, and compassion.

In light of this, we must be humble enough to say that since the Scripture does not speak plainly on this issue, we cannot say with 100% assurance one way or the other. However, though Scripture doesn’t speak clearly to the point, I do think that there are Scriptural principals that seem to point to an understanding of great hope for the salvation of infants and the mentally handicapped. Thus it is my strong conviction from everything I understand about Scripture and the nature of our great God that all infants and all those who are mentally handicapped will join believers in heaven. Furthermore I believe that all young children who have not reached an age of moral accountability will also join believers in heaven.

It must be noted that any answer to the question “must take into account that all of us are born sinful and thus worthy of judgment. The consistent New Testament emphasis upon the need for a second birth indicates that our natural state is that of sin, not innocence (John 3:1-12; Ephesians 2:1-5; cf. Psalm 51:5). We are "by nature children of wrath" (Ephesians 2:3). If we are all born under sin, and salvation is by faith in Christ (which those in question do not seem to have the mental capacity to exercise), then it might at first seem that no infants can be saved.”[1]

But it is apparent in Scripture that there have at least been some babies who were in a saving relationship with the Lord from Birth. These include David and John the Baptist (though an argument for the prophet Jeremiah could possibly also be made). Of David the Scriptures read "Yet you are he who took me from the womb; you made me trust you at my mother's breasts. On you was I cast from my birth, and from my mother's womb you have been my God." (Psalm 22:9-10). Of John the Baptist the Scriptures record that “John the Baptist was filled with the Spirit while yet in his mother's womb (Luke 1:15). In Luke's theology, being filled with the Spirit is consistently seen as an aspect of the Spirit's work among those who are regenerate (Luke 1:41, 67; Acts 2:4; 4:8, 31; 6:3, 5; 9:17; 11:24).”[2] These verses seem to indicate that at least these two Old Testament saints had a saving relationship with God from birth, and therefore it seems very unlikely that all infants who die are lost.
Let us be clear as the guys over at Desiring God Ministries have written, “God is not saving infants because they are innocent. They are not innocent, but guilty. He is saving them because, although they are sinful, in his mercy he desires that compassion be exercised upon those who are sinful and yet lack the capacity to grasp the truth revealed about Him in nature and to the human heart.”

They continue, “It should also be emphasized that the salvation of all who die in infancy is not inconsistent with unconditional election (the view that God chooses whom to save of His own will, apart from anything in the individual). As Spurgeon pointed out, it is not that God chooses someone to salvation because they are going to die in infancy. Rather, He has ordained that only those who have been chosen for salvation will be allowed to die in infancy. God's justice in condemnation will be most clearly seen by allowing those who will not be saved to demonstrate their inherent sinfulness through willful, knowing transgression.”[3]

There are several other reasons for great hope concerning the salvation of young children and the mentally handicapped. This is because the Scriptures taken as a whole do seem to point to an understanding of an age of moral accountability.

It is true that the phrase “Age of Accountability” is nowhere found in the Bible. But what does that prove? Nothing! The age of accountability is just a phrase we use to describe a principle that I believe we find in the Word of God. If we went by the logic that “If the word is not in the Bible, that thus means it is not true”, then we would have to throw out the Word “Trinity” as well because that word is not in the Scriptures, even though it is overtly obvious the principle is. In no way am I saying that the Age of Accountability is anywhere in the realm of being as clearly spoken of and taught as the Trinity is in Scripture, or that it is in any way as remotely as important as the Doctrine of the Trinity. Our whole theology rises and falls with the Trinity! Rather, my point is only that one cannot use the argument that if the “word” is not in the Bible it must not be true. Obviously issues concerning the death of young children or those who are mentally handicapped, etc, are much, much more ambiguous, but I do believe that the Scriptures teach something like an age of accountability. I admit that I could be wrong, but I do believe that if any of my young children died today, that they would go to heaven! I rest in the truthfulness of God’s Word —"Thou art good and doest good." (Psalm 119:68)

Additionally, recall the narrative of the wandering of the nation of Israel in the desert for 40 years. It was only the adults who were barred entrance into the Promised Land because of their idolatrous sin. The children of Israel, (along with the faithful spies Joshua and Caleb) were not rendered guilty and after the forty years, once all of the other adults had passed away, then these now grown children were allowed to entered the Promised land.
Furthermore, recall the story of the death of David’s son born out of adultery with Bathsheba (2 Samuel 12:15b-23). Admittedly, the construction of the Hebrew is such that we cannot draw firm conclusions, however the phrase “shall go to him” seems to point to a personal reunion of David and his dead baby boy.
In Matthew 19:14 Jesus states “Let the children alone, and do not hinder them from coming to Me; for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.” Concerning this verse John MacArthur writes:
“These children were too young to have exercised personal faith. See Luke 18:15 where Luke refers to them as “infants.” Therefore, it is all the more significant that Christ used them as an illustration of those who make up “the kingdom of heaven”. Mark 10:16 also says He “blessed them.” God often shows a special mercy to those who because of age or mental deficiency are incapable of either faith or willful unbelief (Jonah 4:11). They are called “innocents” in Jer. 19:4. This does not mean they are free from the inherited guilt and moral corruption of Adam’s sin, but rather that they are not culpable in the same sense as those whose sins are premeditated and deliberate. Jesus’ words here suggest that God’s mercy is graciously extended to infants and young children so that those who die are sovereignly regenerated (they still need redemption for their inherited sin, and this is still only accomplished by Christ’s sacrificial atonement) and granted entrance into the kingdom – not because they are deserving of heaven, but because God in His grace chooses to redeem them.”[4]
The reference MacArthur gives to Jonah 4:11, is where God inquires of Jonah “Should I not have compassion on Nineveh, the great city in which there are more than 120,000 persons who do not know the difference between their right and left hand, as well as many animals?” At the very least this shows the huge concern that God has for young children and the mentally challenged, those who do not know their right from their left hand.
Another text for consideration is Romans 1:20, “For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made so that they are without excuse.” Here Paul is dealing with people who have not heard the gospel because they have no access to it, but who can clearly see that there is a God through “natural revelation”, that is what they can simply see in creation around them. As Paul states, this “natural revelation” leaves them without excuse. However if a person cannot recognize this natural revelation whether by age or mental disabilities it seems as if Paul implies that they would have an excuse. Again, Desiring God Ministries is helpful here, “The point for us is that even though we human beings are under the penalty of everlasting judgment and death because of the fall of our race into sin and the sinful nature that we all have, nevertheless God only executes this judgment on those who have the natural capacity to see his glory and understand his will, and refuse to embrace it as their treasure. Infants, I believe, do not yet have that capacity; and therefore, in God's inscrutable way, he brings them under the forgiving blood of his Son.”[5]

But by far the strongest argument for the salvation of infants and the mentally-handicapped comes from the worship around the throne of the lamb for all of eternity. Revelation 7:9 clearly points to the fact that around the throne there is a “great multitude which no one could count, from every nation and all tribes and peoples and tongues” worshipping and giving glory to God (emphasis mine). Notice the text reads “every nations, and all tribes and peoples and tongues.” Not one nation, not one tribe, not one people group, not one subset of people with a different dialect/ language will be left out! However, there are obviously people groups who once were, and have ceased to exist who never heard the Gospel, yet the Bible is explicit that God’s people come from every nation, and all tribes and all peoples and all tongues. How is this possible when these people never heard the Gospel? How will they be “represented” among God’s people? It is by all their young children who died and all their mentally handicapped. These are the ones from those tribes who are numbered among God’s people; those who passed on before reaching the age of moral accountability.

Because of all of the above, I firmly believe that every single child who is killed by abortion, or dies in miscarriage, birth, or childhood before the age of moral accountability is numbered among God’s chosen and will enjoy the presence of Christ forever in Heaven. This is true also of all who are mentally handicapped and/or suffer from mental retardation. How this exactly works, I admit is a mystery, I do know that our Heavenly Father is just, fair, and exceedingly good, and I rest in Him.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

In Capitalism we trust!


I am extremely concerned about some of the mantra coming out of the evangelical camp these days. With the election of Barrack Obama as our president elect, conservatives are coming out of the woodwork acting as if now that the liberal left has gained control of our government that now we are on course for the second coming of Christ! God is not taken off guard by the election of Obama as president, in fact, it was by his design!

Now I know this bothers some people and let me say from the outset, I am a heart and soul conservative. But we must never forget that our agenda as the church is build God's kingdom in whatever circumstance He deems necessary. Some of you know that I am not discouraged at all by Barrack Obama being our president. Why you may ask? Because I believe God has ordained it as an opportunity to point people to the true hope found only in Christ, not in politics, economics, conservatism, liberalism, or any other "ism." When people realize that no matter who is in charge of the government (republican, democrat, constitutionalists, or independent), they will realize that government is no place to find redemption. They will realize that government is no place to find renewal! Government is no place to expect lasting change! The only place for lasting change is the unchangeable, immutable, renewing, and redemptive God of glory!

I know that this sounds a little hard to hear, but when I read Romans 13:1-7, I awestruck at the hope I find in a God who frustrates the works of man and ordains ALL who lead in the magistrate. God wills what he wills, so apparently we wishes that our great nation be led under this leadership for such a time as this. As Christians, we must be more concerned about the spread of the Gospel than the spread of conservatism and capitalism.

Jesus is not the least bit concerned about the party platforms of politics! Here is the message Jesus has for the church...BUILD MY KINGDOM! God is in the heavens and He does what he pleases! Nothing will thwart that cause! We, as His church, must be about this cause and no other! Come, Lord Jesus, Come!

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Don't be so open minded


I spent some time perusing through the humanities department of my Alma Mater a couple weeks ago. The Humanities hall houses the Religion and Philosophy departments at Carson Newman. Now let me say from the outset, I am a proud Carson Newman Eagle as am I a proud graduate of those those departments at Carson Newman, but as I walked up and down those hallways, I was struck by the level of close mindedness that was masked with a piety of "openness." The walls were filled with the same quotes and books that were there when I attended CNC. One display reflects Baptist's involvement in the "separation of church and state." Indeed, Baptists did champion separation during those days, but for the purposes of restricting "state" from manipulating the religious freedom and establishing a "state" church. Baptists were pivotal in the movement but we must not think they had any other motives beyond that. Some would have us believe that the long held conviction of "priesthood of the believer" was a Baptist doctrine of tolerance toward many views and interpretations of the scripture. Nothing could be further from the truth. Priesthood of the believer is a reformed conviction set forth by Martin Luther where by they fought for the write of every believer to have his or her own bible in a readable language. The fact is that Luther saw this a point of discipleship not a point of personal freedom. He was repulsed by the manipulation of the Bible by the Catholic church. Luther would have dismissed some of these silly ideas being set forth today by some so called "theologians" as pure jibberish!

Does this not have a contemporary ring to it? There at those who find Christians who are vocal about their political involvement repugnant. Certainly, some have sold their allegiances to one party as if that party is a savior for biblical values. This of course is lunacy! But lets make a clear distinction, every believer must be fully engaged in life and be so affected by the scriptures that it causes a deep passion to well up in them for the glory of God! This means being passionately involved in every area of life...including politics. The distortion of Church/State issues and the human bend toward unbalanced tolerance is causing some to privatize their Christian values and convictions. This is truly sad! Yes, Baptists fought hard for religious freedom and yes they believed that a truly believed that every faith should have freedom to carry out their religious convictions as they wished. But a resounding no must be said to a conviction that a society must be completely pluralistic in order to be free. Ideas are only as good as our ability to set forth some as good and others as bad. To echo the mantra of our day that no one has an exclusive right to truth is simple irrational and right down silly. If that statement is true, our society would not be where it is today. Pluralism does not equate to a dismissal of conviction. We must not be duped into thinking that the modern definition of tolerance is accurate. Tolerance is not what our world wants. They want affirmation. They want us to say "I'm OK, your OK...now lets get some pie!

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS